PostHeaderIcon It Should Be Done In Camera!

With the advent of post-camera filter software like Tiffen’s Dfx4 and powerful color grading tools like Davinci Resolve, it’s easy to see how some shooters, even some relatively accomplished ones,  no longer see the need for an on-camera filter. But this can be a big mistake. Especially given today’s onslaught of low- and mid-level 4K camcorders and DSLRs that produce overly harsh albeit very high resolution images.

Truth is, the impact of some optical filters cannot be effectively recreated in post. The polarizer, for example, is the only filter capable of increasing contrast and resolution;  it is simply not possible to add picture detail post-camera if the detail was not captured in the first place.

Then there is the matter of finishing filters like the Tiffen Satin and Black Satin, and the Schneider Digicon and Black Magic types. These filters have become more or less obligatory in recent years, to mitigate the clinical brash look characteristic of many low-cost 4K cameras. The Blackmagic URSA, AJA Cion, and other relatively economical camcorders and DSLRs, often exhibit very poor shadow integrity along with a harsh roll-off in the highlights, which can only be effectively ameliorated by a proper finishing  filter.

Today’s sharper diffusion filters from Tiffen, Schneider, and others, produce very little scatter and halation, and for all intents and purposes, are invisible to the viewer, but produce a more flattering look with lower noise in the shadows and smoother more pleasing highlights. Most importantly, these filters maintain sharpness in the pupil of the eye, while subtly blending and softening the skin tones and around the eye sockets and face.  This is possible because these filters are designed from the outset with the proper telecentricity to accommodate modern digital sensors with deep bucket photosites.

Older series Black Pro Mist, Soft F/X, Fogs, and Double Fogs, produce too much scatter to be useful with modern cameras fitted with CMOS sensors. Still, having said this, I do find a 1/8 Tiffen Black Pro Mist filter can be useful to match certain type vintage optics, like an old Cooke zoom, to the latest generation Zeiss CP.2.

Today's 4K cameras like the Blackmagic URSA fitted with a Canon 24-70 L lens, produce excessively sharp, clinical-looking images. A proper finishing filter like the Tiffen Black Satin is imperative to glean the best possible performance from such cameras fitted with very high resolution CMOS sensors.

Economical 4K cameras like the Blackmagic URSA tend to produce excessively sharp, clinical-looking images. A proper finishing filter like the Tiffen Black Satin is imperative to glean the best possible performance from such cameras fitted with high resolution CMOS sensors.

3 Responses to “It Should Be Done In Camera!”

  • Gianluca says:

    I’m using now the polarizer filter with c-log in Canon C100.
    What about the black satin tiffen with C-log? Isn’t too soft?

  • admin says:

    The Black Satin maintains excellent sharpness especially in the pupils of the eyes; the use of C-log does not, strictly speaking, affect sharpness. However shadow detail is another issue. Log recording infuses large amounts of oversampled detail into the recordable space, so the Black Satin by opening up additional visibility in the shadows might be seen as excessive depending on the context. Still I would consider the Black Satin, or straight Satin, starting off with a lighter grade.

  • Gianluca says:

    I’m considering to use Contrast filter with Cineon Gamma in Canon C100 instead of C-Log because of the awful shadows in C-Log.
    Thanks for the answer.

Search